California Case Summaries

William Caldwell v. Luis Garnica — Habeas Petition Dismissed Without Prejudice for Failure to Prosecute

Unreported / Non-Citable

Case
William Caldwell v. Luis Garnica
Court
U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
Judge
Dale A. Drozd
Date decided
2026-11-02
Docket No.
2:26-cv-00286
Topics
habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, findings and recommendations, de novo review, certificate of appealability, dismissal without prejudice

Disposition notice

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California adopted in full the magistrate judge's April 20, 2026 findings and recommendations and dismissed William Caldwell's § 2254 habeas petition without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. Caldwell, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, had been granted leave to amend after his original petition lacked a statement of specific facts, but he did not file an amended petition within the thirty-day period and did not object to the findings and recommendations. After conducting de novo review under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the court concluded the findings and recommendations were supported by the record and proper analysis. The court also declined to issue a certificate of appealability, finding that reasonable jurists would not find the dismissal debatable, and directed the Clerk to close the case.

Read the public order

Scroll to Top