Appellate Division (Superior Court), Litigation, Real Estate Law
automatic /
May 27, 2026
The Appellate Division holds that a three-day pay-or-quit eviction notice is void where the mail payment option lists only a “leasing office” without the name and telephone number of a specific person, as required by Code of Civil Procedure section 1161(2).
Appellate Division (Superior Court), Litigation, Real Estate Law
automatic /
May 19, 2026
The Appellate Division held that a surviving spouse who lived in a Santa Monica rent-controlled apartment with the original tenant was an implied at-will tenant protected by the city's rent control charter, and that Costa-Hawkins did not preempt those local protections.
Appellate Division (Superior Court), Family Law, Real Estate Law
automatic /
May 15, 2026
The Appellate Division of LA Superior Court affirmed judgment for a surviving spouse in an unlawful detainer action, holding she was an implied at-will tenant protected by Santa Monica rent control, and that Costa-Hawkins did not preempt the city’s 425% rent increase prohibition.
Appellate Division (Superior Court), Civil Procedure, Real Estate Law
automatic /
March 20, 2026
Los Angeles Appellate Division holds that noncompliance with Civil Code section 1962 is an affirmative defense for which the tenant bears the burden of proof in a residential unlawful detainer action.
Appellate Division (Superior Court), Civil Procedure, Litigation, Real Estate Law
automatic /
February 5, 2026
Los Angeles Appellate Division reverses an unlawful-detainer default judgment and terminating sanction, holding the trial court abused its discretion by retroactively shortening Code of Civil Procedure section 1987's 10-day notice period to 91 minutes and then striking the tenant's answer for not appearing.
Appellate Division (Superior Court), Collections & Creditor Rights, Litigation
automatic /
February 3, 2026
Santa Clara Appellate Division reverses a debt-buyer's trial judgment, holding the trial court erred in admitting testimony from an undisclosed witness and account records that were not properly authenticated under the business-records hearsay exception.
Appellate Division (Superior Court), Labor & Employment Law, Litigation, Real Estate Law
automatic /
January 27, 2026
Los Angeles Appellate Division affirms an unlawful-detainer judgment against a resident manager whose tenancy was tied to her employment, holding the Tenant Protection Act's 60-day notice and just-cause requirements do not apply where housing was provided as employment compensation under a written agreement.