California Case Summaries

Litigation

Primary practice area

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law, Litigation

Hogan v. Bean — Ninth Circuit denies en banc rehearing in death-penalty habeas case, leaving in place panel’s broad reading of Martinez v. Ryan despite forceful nine-judge dissent

The Ninth Circuit denies en banc rehearing in a Nevada death-penalty habeas case, leaving in place a panel decision allowing the petitioner to invoke Martinez v. Ryan to revive long-defaulted trial-ineffective-assistance claims, over a forceful dissent from nine judges.

1st District Court of Appeal, Criminal Law, Litigation

People v. Hsiung — Animal Rights Activist’s Trespass Convictions Partially Reversed for Erroneous Limitation on Mistake of Law Defense

First District partially reverses animal rights activist's trespass convictions arising from open-rescue activities at Sonoma County poultry farms, holding the trial court erred by limiting evidence of the defendant's good-faith mistake of law about the legality of his conduct under the necessity doctrine, while affirming the misdemeanor trespass conviction and rejecting First Amendment challenges.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law, Litigation

Scott v. Broomfield — Ninth Circuit reverses habeas relief in California death-penalty case, holding the state court reasonably rejected the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims under AEDPA’s deferential standard

The Ninth Circuit reverses a federal habeas grant in a California death-penalty case, holding that under AEDPA's doubly deferential standard the California Supreme Court reasonably rejected the petitioner's ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims, including those based on cumulative prejudice.

1st District Court of Appeal, Environmental Law, Litigation

Raptors Are the Solution v. CropLife America — Pesticide Trade Associations That Intervened to Defend Agency Decisions Are Jointly and Severally Liable for Private Attorney General Fees

First District affirms joint and several liability of pesticide trade associations for private attorney general fees following successful CEQA challenge to rodenticide registrations, holding that intervenors who asserted pecuniary interests cannot disclaim those interests to avoid fee liability.

2nd District Court of Appeal, Environmental Law, Litigation

The Chemical Toxin Working Group v. Kroger — Proposition 65 Pre-Suit Notice Substantially Complies When Outside Counsel Contact Is Provided

Second District reverses judgment on the pleadings in Proposition 65 enforcement action against Kroger and other grocery companies, holding that providing outside counsel contact information in the 60-day notice substantially complies with California Code of Regulations title 27, section 25903.

2nd District Court of Appeal, Litigation, Personal Injury & Tort

Chang v. Southern California Permanente Medical Group — Going and Coming Rule Bars Vicarious Liability for Employee’s Commute Even Where Employee Sometimes Worked from Home

Second District affirms summary judgment for medical group under the going and coming rule in case where employee struck a bicyclist while turning into a parking lot during her morning commute, holding that the employee's permission to work from home on certain days did not convert her home into a second worksite for purposes of the day in question.

2nd District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Litigation

Detrick v. Shimada — Declaration in English From Witness Who Cannot Read English Is Not Competent Evidence Without Interpreter Attestation

Second District reverses summary judgment for malicious prosecution defendant, holding that an English-language declaration purportedly reflecting the words of a witness who could not read or speak English is not competent evidence without attestation from a qualified interpreter or translator.

4th District Court of Appeal, Criminal Law, Litigation

People v. The North River Insurance Co. — Defendant’s Counsel Appearance Under Section 977 Triggers Bail Bond Exoneration; Court Retains Jurisdiction to Award Extradition Costs

Fourth District holds that a defendant's appearance through counsel under Penal Code section 977 satisfies the appearance requirement for bail bond exoneration and that the trial court retained jurisdiction to award extradition costs after conditional exoneration.

4th District Court of Appeal, Construction Law, Litigation

AVL Test Systems v. Hensel Phelps Construction — Whether Equipment Becomes “Fixed Part of the Structure” for Contractor Licensing Exemption Is a Question of Fact

Fourth District reverses summary judgment for general contractor in $73 million emissions testing equipment dispute, holding that whether the equipment becomes a fixed part of the structure for purposes of the contractor licensing finished products exemption is a question of fact when supported by conflicting expert testimony.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law, Litigation

Public Interest Legal Foundation v. Nago — Ninth Circuit holds the NVRA’s public inspection provision does not require states to disclose statewide voter lists, only records of voter list maintenance activities

The Ninth Circuit holds that the NVRA's public inspection provision requires states to disclose records about their voter list maintenance activities but not the underlying statewide voter rolls themselves, affirming dismissal of an election-integrity nonprofit's NVRA suit against Hawaii.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law, Litigation

Roe v. Johnston — Ninth Circuit stays Arizona injunction that had struck the word ‘operation’ from state birth-certificate-amendment law for transgender residents

The Ninth Circuit grants a stay pending appeal of an Arizona district court injunction that had struck the word 'operation' from the state's birth-certificate-amendment statute, leaving Arizona's surgical-verification requirement in place while the merits appeal proceeds.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law, Litigation

Reach Community Development v. USDHS — Ninth Circuit stays Portland injunction barring tear gas at ICE protests, holding bystanders likely have no substantive-due-process right against incidental chemical exposure

The Ninth Circuit stays a Portland district court injunction barring federal officers from using tear gas to disperse demonstrators outside an ICE facility, holding that nearby apartment residents likely have no substantive-due-process right to be free from incidental chemical exposure.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law, Litigation

Dickinson v. Trump — Ninth Circuit stays Portland injunction restricting federal crowd-control tactics, faulting overbroad class relief and uniform-redesign order in protest-retaliation case

The Ninth Circuit stays a sweeping district court injunction that had restricted federal officers' use of non-lethal crowd-control munitions and ordered ICE agent uniforms redesigned, holding the underlying First Amendment retaliation theory unlikely to succeed and the relief overbroad and improperly class-wide.

3rd District Court of Appeal, Environmental Law, Litigation

People ex rel. Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District v. Defty — Cross-Complaint Challenging Validity of Underlying Agency Policy Does Not Arise From Protected Activity for Anti-SLAPP Purposes

Third District affirms denial of anti-SLAPP motion to strike a cross-complaint challenging the validity of an air quality management district's underlying interpretive policy, holding that the cross-complaint did not arise from the district's protected enforcement activities.

1st District Court of Appeal, Criminal Law, Litigation

People v. Emrick — Probation Condition Allowing Probation Department to Jail Defendant Without Hearing Improperly Delegates Judicial Authority

First District holds that a probation condition allowing the probation department to incarcerate a defendant for up to 120 days without a court hearing improperly delegates judicial authority and that denying custody credit for residential treatment requires a knowing waiver under Penal Code section 2900.5.

2nd District Court of Appeal, Labor & Employment Law, Litigation

Stoker v. Blue Origin — Blue Origin Arbitration Agreement Substantively and Procedurally Unconscionable; Severance Not Appropriate

Second District affirms denial of Blue Origin's motion to compel arbitration of former employee's FEHA sexual harassment and other claims, holding that the arbitration agreement is both substantively and procedurally unconscionable due to lack of mutuality and one-sided carve-outs, and that severance is not appropriate.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law, Litigation

United States v. State of California — Ninth Circuit grants injunction barring enforcement of California’s No Vigilantes Act ID requirement against federal officers, holding the law violates the Supremacy Clause

The Ninth Circuit grants the United States an injunction pending appeal barring California from enforcing the No Vigilantes Act's visible-identification requirement against federal officers, holding that the law likely violates the Supremacy Clause by directly regulating the federal government's performance of its functions.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law, Litigation

Moving Oxnard Forward v. Lopez — Ninth Circuit en banc upholds Oxnard’s per-candidate and aggregate campaign-contribution limits against First Amendment challenge

Sitting en banc, the Ninth Circuit upholds the City of Oxnard's voter-enacted per-candidate and aggregate campaign-contribution limits, holding the City sufficiently demonstrated an anti-corruption interest and that the limits are closely drawn to that interest under Randall v. Sorrell.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law, Litigation

J.R. v. Ventura Unified School District — Ninth Circuit holds IDEA’s two-year clock starts when parents reasonably suspect inadequate special education, not when a later diagnosis confirms it

The Ninth Circuit holds that the IDEA's two-year statute of limitations starts when parents know or should know that the school district has failed to assess their child and that the child's education is inadequate, time-barring the family's claims for special-education services received before 2019.

2nd District Court of Appeal, Labor & Employment Law, Litigation

Santana v. Studebaker Health Care Center — Multiple Arbitration Documents With Minor Ambiguities Form Enforceable Agreement

Second District reverses denial of motion to compel arbitration in nursing facility wage and hour class action, holding that three arbitration-related onboarding documents must be construed together and form an enforceable agreement despite minor ambiguities and the typical procedural unconscionability of an adhesion contract.

4th District Court of Appeal, Criminal Law, Litigation

Bobo v. Appellate Division of Superior Court — Trial Court Cannot Deny Misdemeanor Vehicular Manslaughter Diversion Based Solely on the Inherent Elements of the Charged Offense

Fourth District grants writ of mandate ordering reconsideration of misdemeanor diversion request in vehicular manslaughter case, holding that the trial court abused its discretion by denying diversion based solely on the inherent elements of the charged offense (negligence causing death) without individualized analysis.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Business Transactions, Litigation

McAuliffe v. Robinson Helicopter — Ninth Circuit holds GARA’s rolling 18-year repose period restarts for replacement parts even without substantive alteration, reviving Hawaiian crash family’s wrongful-death suit against Torrance manufacturer

The Ninth Circuit holds that GARA's rolling provision restarts the 18-year statute of repose for replacement aircraft parts even when the new part is identical to the original, reviving a wrongful-death suit against Torrance-based Robinson Helicopter Company over a fatal Hawaiian sightseeing crash.

Scroll to Top