California Case Summaries

Real Estate Law

Primary practice area

1st District Court of Appeal, Administrative Law, Constitutional Law, Real Estate Law

City of Clearlake v. Highlands Mutual Water Co. — Statute Requiring Cancellation of Public Entity’s Water Company Shares Is Constitutional

automatic / July 7, 2026

The First District holds that Corporations Code section 14300's mandatory cancellation of a public entity's appurtenant water company shares does not violate the California Constitution's limited exception permitting public entities to hold such shares.

1st District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Litigation, Real Estate Law

County of Del Norte v. Britt — Homeowners Wrongly Named in Housing Receivership Can Recover Attorney Fees from the County

automatic / June 11, 2026

When a county names the relatives of a deceased property owner in a housing receivership proceeding and then fails to establish their liability, those relatives are entitled to recover attorney fees from the county under Health and Safety Code section 17980.7(c)(11), which overrides the older, more general bar on cost awards against municipalities.

1st District Court of Appeal, Administrative Law, Constitutional Law, Real Estate Law

Hiller v. Marin Municipal Water District — Ratepayer’s Proposition 218 Challenge Barred by Validation Statutes After Failure to Respond to District’s Validation Action

automatic / June 2, 2026

First District holds that a ratepayer’s Proposition 218 challenge to water rates is permanently barred after she failed to participate in the water district’s validation action within the 120-day window set by Government Code section 53759.

Appellate Division (Superior Court), Family Law, Real Estate Law

Colonial Manor v. Reyes — Surviving Spouse Protected by Rent Control After Original Tenant’s Death, Costa-Hawkins Does Not Preempt

automatic / May 15, 2026

The Appellate Division of LA Superior Court affirmed judgment for a surviving spouse in an unlawful detainer action, holding she was an implied at-will tenant protected by Santa Monica rent control, and that Costa-Hawkins did not preempt the city’s 425% rent increase prohibition.

4th District Court of Appeal, Litigation, Real Estate Law, Tax (non-estate)

Waterford Property Co. v. County of Orange — Declaratory Relief Claim Against Tax Assessor Arises from Protected Speech Under Anti-SLAPP Statute

automatic / May 11, 2026

Fourth District holds that a property company’s declaratory relief claim challenging tax assessments arose from the county assessor’s protected speech and petitioning under the anti-SLAPP statute, reversing the trial court’s denial of the county’s motion to strike.

1st District Court of Appeal, Environmental Law, Real Estate Law

Citizens Against Marketplace Apartment/Condo Development v. City of San Ramon — Approval of Mixed-Use Infill Housing Project Was Consistent With City General Plan and Zoning

automatic / April 24, 2026

First District affirms approval of 44-unit mixed-use infill housing project on former shopping center site in San Ramon, holding that the project was consistent with the City's general plan and zoning ordinance and that aspirational planning language did not impose mandatory master plan requirements.

California Supreme Court, Administrative Law, Real Estate Law

Shear Development Co. v. California Coastal Commission — Courts Decide Coastal Commission Jurisdiction Independently, and the Commission Cannot Take Appeals Just Because a Site Allows Multiple Principal Uses

automatic / April 23, 2026

The California Supreme Court holds that courts must independently review whether the Coastal Commission has appellate jurisdiction over a local permit decision and that the Commission cannot exercise that jurisdiction merely because a site allows multiple principal uses.

1st District Court of Appeal, Litigation, Real Estate Law

Western Manufactured Housing Communities Assn. v. City of Santa Rosa — Penal Code Section 396 Rent Cap Locks Mobilehome Rents at Pre-Emergency Levels Throughout Declared Emergency

automatic / April 17, 2026

First District holds that Penal Code section 396's 10 percent emergency rent increase cap locks mobilehome rental prices at the amount authorized under the local rent control ordinance at the time of the emergency declaration, preventing landlords from stacking annual ordinance-based increases during multi-year emergencies.

2nd District Court of Appeal, Litigation, Real Estate Law

Aerni v. RR San Dimas, L.P. — Civil Code Section 1940.1 Does Not Require Individualized Proof of “Primary Residence” for Class Certification

automatic / April 16, 2026

Second District reverses denial of class certification in 28-day shuffle case under Civil Code section 1940.1, holding that whether a hotel qualifies as a residential hotel turns on building-wide use patterns rather than individualized proof of each class member's primary residence.

4th District Court of Appeal, Litigation, Real Estate Law

The Retail Property Trust v. Orange County Assessment Appeals Board — COVID-19 Pandemic Restrictions Did Not Cause “Damage” Triggering Tax Reassessment Under Section 170

automatic / April 15, 2026

Fourth District holds that the COVID-19 pandemic and related government restrictions did not cause "damage" to the Brea Mall within the meaning of Revenue and Taxation Code section 170(a)(1), and that calamity reassessment requires actual physical damage to property.

5th District Court of Appeal, Litigation, Real Estate Law

Tulare Medical Center Property Owners Assn. v. Valdivia — CC&Rs Adopted by Public Entity Cannot Prohibit Abortion Clinics in Medical Common Interest Development

automatic / April 8, 2026

Fifth District holds that CC&Rs adopted by a public hospital district cannot be enforced to prohibit a clinic from providing abortion services because such enforcement would violate the California Constitution's reproductive freedom guarantee and Civil Code section 531.

3rd District Court of Appeal, Environmental Law, Real Estate Law

Department of Water Resources Cases — DWR may use precondemnation entry statutes to investigate properties without first authorizing or funding the underlying water project

automatic / March 26, 2026

Third District holds that the California Department of Water Resources may use the precondemnation entry statutes to investigate properties for a potential water conveyance project without first satisfying Water Code requirements for project authorization and funding.

2nd District Court of Appeal, Litigation, Real Estate Law

Aerni v. RR San Dimas — Civil Code section 1940.1 ‘residential hotel’ showing does not require individualized proof that each plaintiff used the hotel as primary residence

automatic / March 25, 2026

Second District reverses denial of class certification in a Red Roof Inn 28-day shuffle case, holding that Civil Code section 1940.1 does not require each class member to prove individualized use of the hotel as their primary residence.

Scroll to Top