California Case Summaries

People v. Robles — Third District Court of Appeal Affirms Judgment in Wende Review

Unreported / Non-Citable

Case
People v. Robles
Court
3rd District Court of Appeal
Judge
Mauro, Acting P. J.; Renner, J.; Boulware Eurie, J.
Date decided
2026-10-28
Docket No.
C105579
Topics
Wende review, no arguable issues, plea agreement, Vehicle Code violations, judgment affirmed

Disposition notice

The Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment against Ian Michael Almon Robles. Appointed counsel filed a brief under People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, asking the court to review the record for arguable issues on appeal. Defendant was advised of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days, but no communication was received. After examining the entire record, the court found no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant and affirmed the judgment. Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement with a maximum sentence of two years eight months, defendant pleaded no contest to driving or taking a vehicle without consent (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a) — count one), fleeing a peace officer while driving recklessly (Veh. Code, § 2800.2, subd. (a) — count four), and driving under the influence of a drug (Veh. Code, § 23152, subd. (f) — count five). The trial court denied probation and sentenced defendant to the middle term of two years in prison on count one, a consecutive eight months on count four, and a concurrent 180 days in county jail on count five, awarded 93 days of presentence credit (47 actual and 46 conduct), and ordered a $1,200 restitution fine, a $1,200 parole revocation fine, a $160 court operations assessment, a $120 criminal conviction assessment, and $5,621.20 in victim restitution. Defendant did not request a certificate of probable cause.

Read the public order

Scroll to Top