California Case Summaries

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Labor & Employment Law, Litigation

Gessele v. Jack in the Box — Ninth Circuit reverses key wage-and-hour rulings, restoring class claims for shortened meal breaks and shoe-cost deductions under Oregon law

The Ninth Circuit reverses key rulings in a long-running Jack in the Box wage-and-hour class action, restoring class claims for shortened meal breaks under Oregon law and for non-slip shoe deductions, and ordering a trial on whether overdeductions for the Oregon Workers' Benefit Fund were willful.

California Supreme Court, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law

People v. Bertsch and Hronis — Convictions Affirmed, Bertsch Death Sentence Stands, but Hronis Death Sentence Vacated Because of Later Changes to Self-Representation Law

The California Supreme Court affirms the convictions and Bertsch's death sentence in this 1985 kidnap-rape-murder case but reverses Hronis's death sentence because of post-trial changes in the law governing a defendant's mental competency to represent himself.

1st District Court of Appeal, Administrative Law, Litigation

Cleare v. Superior Court — School District Cannot Claim Impossibility Defense to Teacher Credentialing Requirements Without Exhausting State Waiver Process

First District holds that the West Contra Costa Unified School District failed to establish the impossibility defense to teacher credentialing requirements because it did not show it had exhausted available waiver processes before the Commission on Teacher Credentialing and the State Board of Education.

6th District Court of Appeal, Labor & Employment Law, Litigation

Paknad v. Superior Court — Employer’s Avoidable Consequences Defense Waives Work Product Protection for Investigator’s Factual Findings

Sixth District grants second writ of mandate, holding that an employer that raised the avoidable consequences defense waived work product protection over the investigator's factual findings, and that allowing redactions of all factual findings exceeded the scope of any remaining work product protection.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Business Transactions, Litigation

Panelli v. Target Corporation — Ninth Circuit revives California consumer class action over allegedly impossible 800-thread-count cotton sheets, holding a literally false claim can deceive even when its falsity is verifiable

The Ninth Circuit reverses dismissal of a California consumer class action against Target over allegedly impossible 800-thread-count cotton sheets, holding that the literally false advertising framework applies when a label is unambiguous and that a physically impossible claim can still deceive a reasonable consumer.

1st District Court of Appeal, Litigation, Real Estate Law

Western Manufactured Housing Communities Assn. v. City of Santa Rosa — Penal Code Section 396 Rent Cap Locks Mobilehome Rents at Pre-Emergency Levels Throughout Declared Emergency

First District holds that Penal Code section 396's 10 percent emergency rent increase cap locks mobilehome rental prices at the amount authorized under the local rent control ordinance at the time of the emergency declaration, preventing landlords from stacking annual ordinance-based increases during multi-year emergencies.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Business Transactions, Litigation

Brown v. The Brita Products Company — Ninth Circuit affirms dismissal of California consumer suit, holding no reasonable consumer expects a $15 water filter to remove every contaminant

The Ninth Circuit affirms dismissal of a California consumer class action against Brita, holding that no reasonable consumer would expect a low-cost water filter to remove every common contaminant when the packaging only claims to 'reduce' specific listed contaminants and directs buyers to a Performance Data Sheet.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law, Labor & Employment Law

Gonzales v. Battelle Energy Alliance — Ninth Circuit holds that revoking a Security Police Officer’s fitness-for-duty certification is reviewable under the ADA, distinguishing it from a national-security clearance

The Ninth Circuit holds that a federal contractor's revocation of a Security Police Officer's Part 1046 fitness-for-duty certification is reviewable under the ADA and is not the kind of national-security clearance decision insulated from review under Department of Navy v. Egan.

2nd District Court of Appeal, Litigation, Real Estate Law

Aerni v. RR San Dimas, L.P. — Civil Code Section 1940.1 Does Not Require Individualized Proof of “Primary Residence” for Class Certification

Second District reverses denial of class certification in 28-day shuffle case under Civil Code section 1940.1, holding that whether a hotel qualifies as a residential hotel turns on building-wide use patterns rather than individualized proof of each class member's primary residence.

4th District Court of Appeal, Criminal Law, Litigation

People v. Superior Court (Austin) — Judge Who Was Former Homicide Prosecutor Must Be Disqualified from Racial Justice Act Hearing Challenging That Office’s Charging Practices

Fourth District grants writ of mandate disqualifying a judge from presiding over a California Racial Justice Act hearing because her prior service as a homicide prosecutor in the same District Attorney's Office whose charging practices are under review created an appearance of bias.

4th District Court of Appeal, Business Transactions, Litigation

NNN Capital Fund I, LLC v. Mikles — Standing of Purported LLC Representatives Is a Jurisdictional Issue That May Be Raised at Any Time, Including After Arbitration

Fourth District vacates judgment confirming arbitration award and remands for the trial court to determine whether the purported liquidating trustees who brought the action on behalf of an LLC had standing under the company's operating agreement, holding that jurisdictional standing may be challenged at any time.

4th District Court of Appeal, Criminal Law, Litigation

People v. Harzan — Conviction Reversed Where Trial Court Forced Defendant to Choose Between Entrapment Defense and Excluding Decades-Old Sexual Misconduct Evidence

Fourth District reverses conviction where the trial court forced the defendant to choose between asserting a valid entrapment defense and admission of decades-old sexual misconduct evidence from his teenage years, holding that the conditioning violated his constitutional right to present a defense.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law, Immigration

United States v. Gonzalez-Reyes — Ninth Circuit holds California rape conviction is a categorical match for federal aggravated felony, blocking collateral attack on illegal-reentry charge

The Ninth Circuit holds that a California rape conviction under Penal Code section 261(a)(2) is a categorical match for the federal generic definition of rape, qualifying as an aggravated felony and defeating an illegal-reentry defendant's collateral attack on his prior removal order.

1st District Court of Appeal, Criminal Law, Litigation

In re Sebastian C. — Family Home with Community-Based Programming May Qualify as Less Restrictive Program Under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 875

First District holds that placement in a family member's home with community-based programming and supervision can qualify as a "less restrictive program" under Welfare and Institutions Code section 875(f), even though the appeal was dismissed as moot after the youth was placed with his mother.

4th District Court of Appeal, Labor & Employment Law, Litigation

Walton v. Victor Valley Community College District — Nursing Student May Pursue FEHA, Education Code, and Government Claims Against District for Faculty Sexual Harassment

Fourth District reverses summary judgment for community college district on nursing student's sexual harassment claims, holding that the student has standing under FEHA, that her detailed pre-litigation letter substantially complied with the Government Claims Act, and that triable issues exist on her Education Code section 66270 deliberate indifference claim.

4th District Court of Appeal, Litigation, Real Estate Law

The Retail Property Trust v. Orange County Assessment Appeals Board — COVID-19 Pandemic Restrictions Did Not Cause “Damage” Triggering Tax Reassessment Under Section 170

Fourth District holds that the COVID-19 pandemic and related government restrictions did not cause "damage" to the Brea Mall within the meaning of Revenue and Taxation Code section 170(a)(1), and that calamity reassessment requires actual physical damage to property.

4th District Court of Appeal, Criminal Law, Litigation

People v. Espiritu — Trial Court’s Failure to Recognize Presumptively Invalid Reason for Peremptory Challenge Requires Reversal Under Section 231.7

Fourth District reverses convictions in sexual assault case where the trial court failed to recognize that a peremptory challenge based on a juror's nursing occupation was presumptively invalid under Code of Civil Procedure section 231.7, holding that defense counsel's failure to specifically invoke the presumption did not forfeit the issue.

1st District Court of Appeal, Construction Law, Personal Injury & Tort

Cordero v. Ghilotti Construction — Privette Doctrine Bars Subcontractor Worker’s Claim Against Turnkey Contractor for Slip-and-Fall Despite Cal-OSHA Regulation

First District affirms summary judgment for turnkey contractor under the Privette doctrine in suit by injured rebar subcontractor employee, holding that morning site preparation including dewatering does not constitute affirmative contribution under Hooker and that Cal-OSHA regulations are generally delegable through subcontracts.

2nd District Court of Appeal, Administrative Law, Labor & Employment Law

L.A. County Professional Peace Officers Assn. v. County of L.A. — Union Did Not Clearly and Unmistakably Waive Right to Bargain Over Outsourcing Decision

Second District holds that a public employee union did not clearly and unmistakably waive its right to bargain over an outsourcing decision through an MOU clause referring to "reorganization," reversing dismissal of an unfair practice charge against Los Angeles County.

4th District Court of Appeal, Criminal Law, Litigation

People v. Bradley — Stayed Sentences for Unused One Strike Circumstances and Habitual Sexual Offender Law Are Unauthorized

Fourth District affirms forcible rape and related convictions but holds that stayed sentences based on unused One Strike circumstances and the Habitual Sexual Offender law are unauthorized when the defendant is already sentenced under the One Strike law and Three Strikes law for the same offense.

Scroll to Top