California Case Summaries

4th District Court of Appeal, Criminal Law

People v. Barraza — Hair attached to a person is not property for robbery

The Court of Appeal held that attached human hair is part of the body, not personal property under Penal Code section 211. California generally regulates human tissue through specialized statutes rather than ordinary property law, and no statute converts hair severed and taken in a continuous act into property as the Legislature has done for crops and fixtures.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law, Election Law, Litigation

Americans for Prosperity v. Meyer — Arizona campaign-source disclosure survives First Amendment review

A divided Ninth Circuit panel affirmed dismissal of the facial and as-applied challenges. Applying exacting scrutiny, the majority found a substantial relationship between source disclosure and Arizona’s important interest in giving voters accurate information about major campaign-media spending.

Scroll to Top