California Case Summaries

Rodolfo Garcia v. Riverside University Health System — District Court Adopts Recommendation and Dismisses Complaint Without Leave to Amend

Unreported / Non-Citable

Case
Rodolfo Garcia v. Riverside University Health System
Court
U.S. District Court — Central District of California
Judge
John W. Holcomb
Date decided
2026-11-05
Docket No.
5:26-cv-00263
Topics
report and recommendation, dismissal without leave to amend, 28 U.S.C. § 636, failure to object, de novo review, in forma pauperis, judgment of dismissal

Disposition notice

On November 5, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California accepted and adopted the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 10] to dismiss the complaint of Plaintiff Rodolfo Garcia. Because the time for objections had passed with none filed, the court concluded it need not review the findings and conclusions de novo, citing Thomas v. Arn and United States v. Reyna-Tapia. The court ordered that Garcia's complaint is dismissed without leave to amend, that any outstanding requests — including a request to proceed without prepayment of filing fees [ECF No. 2] — are denied as moot, and that judgment dismissing the action will be entered accordingly. The order was signed by United States District Judge John W. Holcomb. The order itself does not set out the underlying reasoning, which is contained in the separately filed Report and Recommendation.

Read the public order

Scroll to Top