California Case Summaries

Miguel Enrique Diaz v. M. Osman, et al. — Court adopts findings and recommendations and dismisses civil rights action without prejudice

Unreported / Non-Citable

Case
Miguel Enrique Diaz v. M. Osman, et al.
Court
U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
Judge
Dale A. Drozd
Date decided
2026-11-05
Docket No.
2:23-cv-01449
Topics
findings and recommendations, dismissal without prejudice, failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, amended complaint, objections, de novo review, 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disposition notice

On November 4, 2026, U.S. District Judge Dale A. Drozd adopted in full the February 18, 2026 findings and recommendations in Miguel Enrique Diaz’s pro se prisoner civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court dismissed the action without prejudice for Diaz’s failure to comply with court orders and failure to prosecute, citing the reasons in the magistrate judge’s November 13, 2025 order, and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case. The order states that Diaz had not filed an amended complaint as directed or objections to the findings and recommendations despite receiving an additional 30 days, and that the court found the recommendations supported by the record and proper analysis after reviewing the magistrate judge’s legal conclusions de novo.

Read the public order

Scroll to Top