Daily Summary — 2026-05-11
Daily Summary — 2026-05-11. 2 case(s) published, 34 investigated but skipped, 16 opinion(s) surfaced across 16 court(s) searched.
2Published
34Skipped
16Opinions surfaced
16Courts searched
4Email mentions
Cases Published
| Case | Court | Date | Practice areas |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States v. Cabrera Ramirez — Ninth Circuit affirms § 1326(d) collateral attack denial where defendant could not show prejudice from immigration counsel's errors | 9th Cir. (C.D. Cal. underlying) | 2026-05-11 | criminal-law, immigration |
| Oden Meyers v. Meink — Ninth Circuit affirms summary judgment for Air Force on Title VII, Rehabilitation Act, and GINA claims arising from Central District of California reassignment and termination | 9th Cir. (C.D. Cal. underlying) | 2026-05-11 | labor-employment-law, litigation |
Cases Investigated but Not Published
- Vicki Chang v. Andrew Vanderwielen (23-35284, 9th Cir. (W.D. Wash. underlying)) — Washington case (Western District of Washington); no California connection
- Yergler v. City of Eugene (25-953, 9th Cir. (D. Or. underlying)) — Oregon case (City of Eugene); no California connection
- Hernandez-De Cornejo v. Blanche (25-3012, 9th Cir. (BIA)) — El Salvador asylum BIA appeal; no California-specific nexus beyond 9th Circuit panel sitting
- Sternberg v. Hendrickson (25-7440, 9th Cir. (N.D. Cal. underlying)) — Pro se preliminary-injunction denial affirmance; routine memorandum disposition
- Oden v. Reed (24-5281, 9th Cir. (N.D. Cal. underlying)) — Pro se prisoner First Amendment retaliation; routine summary-judgment affirmance
- Nealy v. Thornell (25-78, 9th Cir. (D. Ariz. underlying)) — Arizona Department of Corrections case; no California connection
- Ndizeye v. City of San Diego (25-764, 9th Cir. (S.D. Cal. underlying)) — Pro se appellant did not challenge dismissal grounds in opening brief; routine procedural affirmance
- Martinez v. Mullin (24-6870, 9th Cir. (D. Ariz. underlying)) — Arizona TSA employment case; no California connection
- Jarvis v. County of Mohave (25-3987, 9th Cir. (D. Ariz. underlying)) — Mohave County, Arizona case; no California connection
- Hayes v. Centurion of Idaho, LLC (25-7445, 9th Cir. (D. Idaho underlying)) — Idaho prisoner case; no California connection
- Diosdado v. Huntington Beach Union High School District (25-299, 9th Cir. (C.D. Cal. underlying)) — Pro se parent denied leave to represent minor child without counsel; routine procedural affirmance
- Chen v. Mullin (24-5014, 9th Cir. (C.D. Cal. underlying)) — Pro se APA action over asylum-application delay; fact-specific 12(b)(6) affirmance
- Chen v. Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company (25-50, 9th Cir. (C.D. Cal. underlying)) — Pro se diversity insurance dispute; routine Rule 12(c) affirmance
- Tulare Medical Center Property etc. v. Valdivia (F089334M, 5th District Court of Appeal) — M-suffix modification order; underlying opinion already posted
- Marriage of Nishida & Kamoda (G064200M, 4th District Court of Appeal, Division Three) — M-suffix modification order; underlying opinion already posted
- Cleare et al. v. Super. Ct. (A173289N, 1st District Court of Appeal) — N-suffix modification order; underlying opinion already posted
- Aerni v. RR San Dimas, L.P. (B341484M, 2nd District Court of Appeal) — M-suffix modification order; underlying opinion already posted
- Dept. of Water Resources Cases (C103207M, 3rd District Court of Appeal) — M-suffix modification order; underlying opinion already posted
- People v. Tzul (B343256M, 2nd District Court of Appeal) — M-suffix modification order; underlying opinion already posted
- Chi v. Dept. of Motor Vehicles (A172237M, 1st District Court of Appeal) — M-suffix modification order; underlying opinion already posted
- Marriage of Jenkins (A169217M, 1st District Court of Appeal) — M-suffix modification order; underlying opinion already posted
- The Merchant of Tennis, Inc. v. Superior Ct. (E085766N, 4th District Court of Appeal, Division Two) — N-suffix modification order; underlying opinion already posted
- Cleare et al. v. Super. Ct. (A173289M, 1st District Court of Appeal) — M-suffix modification order; underlying opinion already posted
- Meiner v. Superior Court (G065769M, 4th District Court of Appeal, Division Three) — M-suffix modification order; underlying opinion already posted
- The Merchant of Tennis, Inc. v. Superior Court (E085766M, 4th District Court of Appeal, Division Two) — M-suffix modification order; underlying opinion already posted
- Domestic Partnership of Campos & Munoz (D085584M, 4th District Court of Appeal, Division One) — M-suffix modification order; underlying opinion already posted
- Nichols v. Alghannam (C100433M, 3rd District Court of Appeal) — M-suffix modification order; underlying opinion already posted
- Bartholomew v. Parking Concepts, Inc. (A171546M, 1st District Court of Appeal) — M-suffix modification order; underlying opinion already posted
- Semaan v. Mosier (G064385M, 4th District Court of Appeal, Division Three) — M-suffix modification order; underlying opinion already posted
- Navellier v. Putnam (A172077M, 1st District Court of Appeal) — M-suffix modification order; underlying opinion already posted
- People v. Dixon (F087625M, 5th District Court of Appeal) — M-suffix modification order; underlying opinion already posted
- Microsoft Corp. v. Super. Ct. (B347381M, 2nd District Court of Appeal) — M-suffix modification order; underlying opinion already posted
- People v. Aguilar (D083172M, 4th District Court of Appeal, Division One) — M-suffix modification order; underlying opinion already posted
- Marriage of Starr (A172153M, 1st District Court of Appeal) — M-suffix modification order; underlying opinion already posted
Courts Searched
| Court | Source | Opinions found | Kept after triage | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| California Supreme Court | courts.ca.gov | 0 | 0 | No new published opinions in window |
| 1st District Court of Appeal | courts.ca.gov | 0 | 0 | All published listings already posted; 9 modification orders dedup-skipped this run |
| 2nd District Court of Appeal | courts.ca.gov | 0 | 0 | All published listings already posted; 3 modification orders dedup-skipped this run |
| 3rd District Court of Appeal | courts.ca.gov | 0 | 0 | All published listings already posted; 2 modification orders dedup-skipped this run |
| 4th District Court of Appeal, Division One | courts.ca.gov | 0 | 0 | All published listings already posted; 2 modification orders dedup-skipped this run |
| 4th District Court of Appeal, Division Two | courts.ca.gov | 0 | 0 | All published listings already posted; 2 modification orders dedup-skipped this run |
| 4th District Court of Appeal, Division Three | courts.ca.gov | 0 | 0 | All published listings already posted; 3 modification orders dedup-skipped this run |
| 5th District Court of Appeal | courts.ca.gov | 0 | 0 | All published listings already posted; 2 modification orders dedup-skipped this run |
| 6th District Court of Appeal | courts.ca.gov | 0 | 0 | No new opinions in window |
| Appellate Division of the Superior Court | courts.ca.gov | 0 | 0 | |
| Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals | CourtListener API (ca9) | 16 | 16 | 2 substantive CA-connected cases summarized & published; 1 already posted by earlier run (id=1021, Vena v. MSM); 13 skipped (out-of-state or procedural pro se memoranda) |
| U.S. District Court — Central District of California | CourtListener API (cacd) | 0 | 0 | 0 rows surfaced from district docket; appellate output captured via 9th Circuit |
| U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California | CourtListener API (caed) | 0 | 0 | 0 rows surfaced |
| U.S. District Court — Northern District of California | CourtListener API (cand) | 0 | 0 | cand page-1 fetch timed out (TimeoutError); appellate coverage via 9th Circuit |
| U.S. District Court — Southern District of California | CourtListener API (casd) | 0 | 0 | 0 rows surfaced |
| U.S. Supreme Court (California-related) | CourtListener API (scotus) | 0 | 0 | No CA-named opinions in window |
Email Newsletter Ingest
| Metric | Count |
|---|---|
| Messages processed | 37 |
| Newsletter URLs (case-source) | 16 |
| Case mentions extracted from newsletter bodies | 4 |
Subscribed sources: JD Supra Morning Brief, JD Supra Corporate Brief, Thomson Reuters The Daily Docket, Canadian Lawyer Magazine, Attorney at Work, SCOTUSblog, Reuters Newsletters, Justia (webinars and onward digest), LexBlog topic digests, Law360 Breaking News, Clio newsletter
Sources Consulted
- courts.ca.gov/opinions/publishedcitable-opinions
- courts.ca.gov/opinions/unpublishednon-citable-opinions
- CourtListener API v4 — court_id: ca9, cacd, caed, cand, casd, scotus
- Newsletter inbox (IMAP, read-only)