California Case Summaries

Michael A. Victory v. Dao Vang — Federal court grants transfer of state prisoner’s habeas case to Northern District of California

Unreported / Non-Citable

Case
Michael A. Victory v. Dao Vang
Court
U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
Judge
Chi Soo Kim (District Judges of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2024)
Date decided
2026-11-03
Docket No.
2:26-cv-02631
Topics
habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, transfer of venue, 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d), pro se prisoner, Northern District of California

Disposition notice

On November 3, 2026, Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim granted respondent Dao Vang’s request to transfer Michael A. Victory’s pro se, in forma pauperis application for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The application challenges a Santa Clara County Superior Court conviction. The order explained that both districts had jurisdiction, but the witnesses and evidence needed to resolve the application were more readily available in Santa Clara County, supporting transfer in the furtherance of justice. The docket entry states that the case was closed in the Eastern District following the transfer; the order did not decide the merits of the habeas application.

Read the public order

Scroll to Top