California Case Summaries

Litigation

Primary practice area

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Antitrust, Healthcare Law, Litigation

Surgical Instrument Service v. Intuitive Surgical — Ninth Circuit Revives Robot Aftermarket Antitrust Claims

The Ninth Circuit reversed. The special factors apply when a plaintiff cannot show power in a competitive foremarket and instead claims that a seller later exploited customers locked into a brand. They were unnecessary here because evidence directly supported a conventional claim that dominant foremarket power was leveraged into the tied aftermarket.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law, Labor & Employment Law, Litigation

Nilsen v. University of Washington — Ninth Circuit Refines Arm-of-State Immunity Test

The panel affirmed. Its three factors remain: whether state law created a legally independent entity, whether the state is formally liable for the entity’s debts and judgments, and how much control the state exercises. The Supreme Court’s clarification makes the first factor most important and the control factor least important.

1st District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Litigation, Personal Injury & Tort

Mary D. v. McCauley — Incarcerated Civil Defendant Entitled to Meaningful Trial Access

The Court of Appeal reversed for a new trial. Once McCauley met the threshold showing governing incarcerated civil litigants, the trial court had to meaningfully consider practical measures that would permit access to court; denying additional time to secure counsel under these circumstances was an abuse of discretion and violated constitutional access rights.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Business Transactions, Civil Procedure, Litigation

Devas Multimedia v. Antrix — Foreign Sovereign Cannot Avoid Arbitral Award on Forum Grounds

The Ninth Circuit held that the FSIA arbitration exception supplied subject-matter jurisdiction and that exercising personal jurisdiction was reasonable even assuming Antrix could invoke Fifth Amendment protections. It also held that forum non conveniens does not defeat an action to confirm a Convention award because contracting nations must recognize covered awards and a foreign court cannot attach assets in the United States.

Scroll to Top