California Case Summaries

The People v. Michael Daniel Salinas, F090811 — Judgment affirmed after independent Wende review finds no reasonably arguable issues

Unreported / Non-Citable

Case
People v. Salinas
Court
5th District Court of Appeal
Judge
Franson; Meehan; Sandhu
Date decided
2026-10-27
Docket No.
F090811
Topics
Wende review, independent record review, no arguable issues, shoplifting with priors, Penal Code section 666.1, prior strike allegations, guilty versus no contest discrepancy, judgment affirmed

Disposition notice

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment against Michael Daniel Salinas. The opinion's introduction says he pleaded guilty to shoplifting with prior theft offenses, while its detailed procedural history states that on August 15, 2025, he pleaded no contest to the charged offense and admitted the prior strike convictions; both statements are reported as the opinion prints them. The complaint charged shoplifting with seven prior theft convictions and alleged two prior strike convictions, a prior prison term, and commission of the offense while on supervision as aggravating factors. On October 31, 2025, the Fresno County Superior Court denied his request to dismiss the strikes and imposed the indicated lower term of 16 months, doubled to 32 months. On appeal, appointed counsel filed a Wende brief raising no issues and requesting independent review; Salinas did not file a supplemental brief after invitation. After independent review, the court found no other reasonably arguable factual or legal issues and affirmed. The decision is attributed to THE COURT, with Franson, Acting P. J., Meehan, J., and Sandhu, J. identified in the panel footnote; Stephanie L. Negin is identified as the trial judge.

Read the public order

Scroll to Top