California Case Summaries

ANTHONY LEE WILLIAMS v. TRIMPEY, et al. — District Court Adopts Findings and Recommendations and Dismisses Action Without Prejudice

Unreported / Non-Citable

Case
ANTHONY LEE WILLIAMS v. TRIMPEY, et al.
Court
U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
Judge
Troy L. Nunley
Date decided
2026-11-04
Docket No.
2:24-cv-02148
Topics
findings and recommendations, dismissal without prejudice, failure to amend, pro se prisoner, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Local Rule 110, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b)

Disposition notice

On November 4, 2026, Chief U.S. District Judge Troy L. Nunley adopted in full the magistrate judge's April 21, 2026 findings and recommendations and dismissed this action without prejudice under Local Rule 110 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The order states that Williams, a state prisoner proceeding pro se under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, did not file timely objections. It also states that more than 60 days had passed since the court extended his time to file an amended complaint and warned that failure to amend within that period would result in dismissal. The court reviewed the file and found the findings and recommendations supported by the record and the magistrate judge's analysis. The order does not set out the underlying findings and recommendations or their reasoning.

Read the public order

Scroll to Top