California Case Summaries

Jeremy Peck v. PayTomorrow, LLC, et al. — Court directs clerk to terminate PayTomorrow after voluntary dismissal

Unreported / Non-Citable

Case
Jeremy Peck v. PayTomorrow, LLC, et al.
Court
U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
Judge
Stanley A. Boone
Date decided
2026-11-05
Docket No.
1:26-cv-05965
Topics
voluntary dismissal, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), dismissal without prejudice, termination of defendant, responsive pleading

Disposition notice

On November 5, 2026, Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California ordered the Clerk of Court to terminate Defendant PayTomorrow, LLC in Jeremy Peck v. PayTomorrow, LLC, et al., No. 1:26-cv-05965-JLT-SAB. The order states that Peck filed a notice on November 4, 2026 voluntarily dismissing the action without prejudice as to PayTomorrow under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), and that PayTomorrow had not filed an answer, other responsive pleading, or motion for summary judgment. Citing Ninth Circuit authority, the court explained that this type of dismissal is effective on filing and requires no court order. The order terminates PayTomorrow only; it does not state that the action was dismissed as to any other defendant.

Read the public order

Scroll to Top