4th District Court of Appeal, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law

Anaheim Police Dept. v. Crockett — Gun Violence Restraining Order Properly Issued Against Father Whose Son Threatened a School Shooting

automatic / February 13, 2026

Fourth District affirms a Gun Violence Restraining Order against a father whose adult son with a documented mental-health history threatened a mass shooting at a local high school, holding the order survives Second Amendment, vagueness, and overbreadth challenges.

1st District Court of Appeal, Criminal Law, Litigation

People v. Alston — Conviction Reversed Where Trial Court Failed to Explain Reasons for Overruling Section 231.7 Objection to Peremptory Strike

automatic / February 13, 2026

First District reverses an attempted-lewd-act conviction, holding the trial court violated Code of Civil Procedure section 231.7(d)(1) by failing to explain its reasons for overruling defense counsel's objection to the prosecutor's peremptory strike of a prospective juror.

2nd District Court of Appeal, Business Transactions, Litigation

Diaz v. Thor Motor Coach — Out-of-State Forum-Selection Clause in RV Warranty Unenforceable Against Song-Beverly Claim Even With Stipulation Preserving California Law

automatic / February 13, 2026

Second District reverses an order staying a Song-Beverly action against Thor Motor Coach, holding the warranty's Indiana forum-selection clause is unenforceable even when accompanied by a stipulation that California law would govern.

1st District Court of Appeal, Criminal Law

People v. Flores — Electronics-Search Probation Condition Upheld for Defendant Who Used VOIP and Text to Sell Fentanyl Pills

automatic / February 11, 2026

First District affirms a probation condition allowing warrantless electronics searches as imposed on a defendant who used VOIP and text-message accounts to coordinate the sale of 1,000 fentanyl pills.

2nd District Court of Appeal, Criminal Law

People v. Diaz — Section 1172.6 Resentencing Unavailable for Direct Aider and Abettor of Murder Who Acted With Intent to Kill

automatic / February 11, 2026

Second District affirms denial of section 1172.6 resentencing relief for a defendant convicted of four counts of first-degree murder, holding she remained guilty under current law as a direct aider and abettor with intent to kill — a theory that survived Senate Bill 1437.

4th District Court of Appeal, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law

People v. Zapata — Confession to Undercover ‘Perkins’ Operatives Inadmissible When Suspect Had Invoked Right to Counsel

automatic / February 10, 2026

Fourth District reverses a second-degree-murder conviction, holding that statements obtained from a defendant during an undercover Perkins operation were inadmissible under Miranda because the suspect had invoked his right to counsel and a known law-enforcement officer continued to 'stimulate' the operation in a manner that amounted to custodial interrogation.

6th District Court of Appeal, Administrative Law, Labor & Employment Law, Litigation

Zenith Insurance Co. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board — WCAB Lacked Jurisdiction to Grant Reconsideration After 60-Day Statutory Deadline

automatic / February 10, 2026

Sixth District reverses a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board reconsideration order, holding the Board exceeded its jurisdiction by granting reconsideration after the former section 5909 60-day deadline ran and that the narrow grounds for equitable tolling were not satisfied.

1st District Court of Appeal, Criminal Law

In re J.C. — Brandishing an Imitation Firearm Does Not Trigger Penal Code’s Firearm Prohibition for Juvenile Offenders

automatic / February 9, 2026

First District holds that brandishing an imitation firearm under Penal Code section 417.4 is not among the offenses that trigger the juvenile-firearm ban under Penal Code section 29820, and vacates that probation condition.

2nd District Court of Appeal, Family Law, Litigation

In re Reyna R. — Juvenile Court Must Consider Father’s Ability to Pay Before Requiring Professional Visitation Monitor at His Expense

automatic / February 9, 2026

Second District holds that a juvenile court ordering monitored visitation by a paid professional must first consider the parent's ability to pay and the availability of reasonable alternatives, where the parent has timely raised an inability-to-pay objection.

2nd District Court of Appeal, Family Law

Marriage of Allen — Parents Cannot Contractually Waive Child-Support Arrearages, Even After the Children Reach the Age of Majority

automatic / February 6, 2026

Second District holds that California's prohibition on parental contractual waiver of child-support arrearages applies even after the children have reached the age of majority and there is no current support order in place.

4th District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Litigation

Semaan v. Mosier — Court-Appointed Receivers Are Protected by Quasi-Judicial Immunity for Discretionary Acts; Anti-SLAPP Motion Granted

automatic / February 6, 2026

Fourth District holds that a court-appointed receiver is protected by quasi-judicial immunity for discretionary acts and decisions, affirming the grant of an anti-SLAPP motion to strike claims against the receiver brought by a criminal defendant and his family.

1st District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Litigation

Bartholomew v. Parking Concepts, Inc. — Collecting License Plate Data Without Required ALPR Policy Is Itself a Cognizable Harm

automatic / February 5, 2026

First District holds a parking-garage operator's collection of customers' license-plate information without the publicly available ALPR policy California law requires is itself the kind of harm that supports a private suit under the ALPR Law.

4th District Court of Appeal, Criminal Law, Litigation

Esparza v. Superior Court — LPS Grave-Disability Finding Is Not Equivalent to Incompetence to Testify Under Evidence Code Section 701

automatic / February 5, 2026

Fourth District grants writ relief, holding that a probate court's grave-disability finding under the LPS Act does not establish that the person is incompetent to testify under Evidence Code section 701, which requires its own determination.

4th District Court of Appeal, Business Transactions, Litigation

Grant v. Chapman University — University Statements About On-Campus Education Are Not Specific Enough to Form an Implied Promise of In-Person Instruction

automatic / February 5, 2026

Fourth District affirms summary judgment for Chapman University in a COVID-19 tuition-refund case, holding that the university's general descriptions of campus facilities and 'face-to-face' contact were not specific enough to form an enforceable implied promise of in-person education.

Appellate Division (Superior Court), Civil Procedure, Litigation, Real Estate Law

Gerard v. Cuevas — Trial Court Abused Discretion by Imposing Terminating Sanction for Tenant’s Failure to Comply With Last-Minute Notice to Attend Trial

automatic / February 5, 2026

Los Angeles Appellate Division reverses an unlawful-detainer default judgment and terminating sanction, holding the trial court abused its discretion by retroactively shortening Code of Civil Procedure section 1987's 10-day notice period to 91 minutes and then striking the tenant's answer for not appearing.

4th District Court of Appeal, Labor & Employment Law, Litigation

Parsonage v. Wal-Mart Associates — ICRAA $10,000 Statutory Damages Available Without Proof of Concrete Injury in Employment Background-Check Cases

automatic / February 4, 2026

Fourth District reverses summary judgment for Wal-Mart, holding California's Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act allows employees to recover the $10,000 statutory damages award for ICRAA disclosure violations without proving any concrete injury such as an adverse employment decision.

4th District Court of Appeal, Criminal Law

People v. Gomez — Prosecutor’s ‘Dog and Slushy’ Analogy About Circumstantial Evidence Did Not Violate the Racial Justice Act

automatic / February 4, 2026

Fourth District affirms convictions but remands for resentencing in a vehicle-theft case, holding the prosecutor's and defense counsel's use of a 'dog drinking a slushy' analogy to explain circumstantial evidence did not violate the Racial Justice Act.

1st District Court of Appeal, Estate Planning, Probate and Tax Law, Litigation, Probate

Conservatorship of A.B. — Substantial Evidence Supported Renewal of LPS Conservatorship and Involuntary Medication Order for Person With Schizophrenia

automatic / February 4, 2026

First District affirms LPS conservatorship renewal and involuntary medication order for a 42-year-old man with undifferentiated schizophrenia, finding substantial evidence supports continued grave disability and incompetence to refuse antipsychotic medication.

4th District Court of Appeal, Business Transactions, Litigation

Higginson v. Kia Motors America — Trial Court Should Have Imposed Terminating Sanctions for Kia’s False Discovery Responses About Engine-Defect Records

automatic / February 3, 2026

Fourth District reverses a defense judgment in a Song-Beverly action against Kia, holding the trial court abused its discretion by accepting Kia's false verified discovery responses about engine-defect records and failing to impose terminating sanctions when the falsity was revealed.

Appellate Division (Superior Court), Collections & Creditor Rights, Litigation

Spring Oaks Capital SPV v. Fowler — Debt Buyer Cannot Win Trial Without Disclosed Witness Address and Properly Authenticated Business Records

automatic / February 3, 2026

Santa Clara Appellate Division reverses a debt-buyer's trial judgment, holding the trial court erred in admitting testimony from an undisclosed witness and account records that were not properly authenticated under the business-records hearsay exception.

California Supreme Court, Labor & Employment Law, Litigation

Fuentes v. Empire Nissan — Tiny, Unreadable Contract Print Goes to Procedural, Not Substantive, Unconscionability — but Courts Must Scrutinize Illegible Terms Closely

automatic / February 2, 2026

The California Supreme Court clarifies that an unreadably small or blurry contract goes to procedural unconscionability, not substantive unconscionability — but illegibility triggers heightened scrutiny of the underlying terms for unfairness.

1st District Court of Appeal, Environmental Law, Litigation, Real Estate Law

The Committee for Tiburon LLC v. Town of Tiburon — Program-Level CEQA EIR for General Plan Need Not Analyze Site-Specific Impacts of Listed Housing Sites

automatic / February 2, 2026

First District holds a program-level Environmental Impact Report for a local government's general plan update need not include site-specific environmental analysis of housing-element inventory sites where no actual housing project has been proposed.

1st District Court of Appeal, Business Transactions, Litigation

Navellier v. Putnam — Bankruptcy Stay Did Not Block Appeal Brought by Debtor; Defendants’ Trial Verdict and Fee Award Affirmed

automatic / February 2, 2026

First District holds the automatic bankruptcy stay does not bar appellate proceedings the debtor itself brought, and affirms a defense verdict and attorney-fee award in a $1.5 million loan-related contract and fraud dispute.

2nd District Court of Appeal, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law

People v. Heaps — UCLA Gynecologist’s Convictions Reversed Where Trial Court’s Ex Parte Communications With Jury Deprived Defendant of Counsel

automatic / February 2, 2026

Second District reverses convictions of former UCLA gynecologic oncologist James Heaps, holding the trial court's ex parte communications with the jury through a judicial assistant — without notifying counsel — deprived defendant of counsel at a critical stage and the prosecution failed to prove the error was harmless.

2nd District Court of Appeal, Litigation, Tax (non-estate)

Disney Platform Distribution v. City of Santa Barbara — Streaming Services Are Subject to Santa Barbara’s Video Users’ Tax

automatic / January 30, 2026

Second District (on rehearing) holds Santa Barbara's modernized video users' tax applies to internet video streaming services like Hulu, Disney+, and ESPN+, and rejects challenges under the federal Internet Tax Freedom Act, the First Amendment, and California Constitution Article XIII C.