California Case Summaries

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Banking & Finance, Civil Procedure, Litigation

Relator LLC v. Erskine — Ninth Circuit Revives PPP Fraud Whistleblower Suit, Holds Mortgage Company’s Own Website Is Not “News Media” Under False Claims Act

automatic / July 15, 2026

The Ninth Circuit reversed dismissal of a False Claims Act qui tam suit alleging PPP fraud by a California mortgage company, holding that a NAICS industry code alone does not publicly disclose fraud and that a company's own website does not qualify as 'news media' for purposes of the Act's public disclosure bar.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Business Transactions, Intellectual Property, Litigation

Comet Technologies USA v. XP Power — Ninth Circuit Vacates $40 Million Trade Secret Verdict Over Burden-of-Proof Error

automatic / July 14, 2026

The Ninth Circuit vacated a $40 million jury verdict for semiconductor component maker Comet Technologies and ordered a new trial after finding that the district court erroneously placed the burden of proving "ready ascertainability" of alleged trade secrets on XP Power rather than on Comet, in violation of the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Civil Procedure, Litigation

Price v. Diab — ADA Plaintiff Who Wins Accessibility Injunction via Default Judgment Is a “Prevailing Party” Entitled to Attorney’s Fees

automatic / July 13, 2026

The Ninth Circuit holds that an ADA plaintiff who obtains a default judgment and injunction requiring a Fontana Family Dollar to fix accessibility barriers is a “prevailing party” entitled to seek attorney’s fees — even though the injunction only requires what federal law already mandates.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Administrative Law, Banking & Finance, Constitutional Law

Novedades y Servicios v. FinCEN — Ninth Circuit Upholds Block on Treasury’s Sweeping Southwest Border Cash-Reporting Order

automatic / July 13, 2026

The Ninth Circuit affirms a preliminary injunction blocking FinCEN’s “Border GTO” — which required money services businesses in 30 southwest border ZIP codes to file cash-transaction reports for amounts as low as $200 — finding the order was likely a rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking and that it was adopted in an arbitrary and capricious manner.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Civil Procedure, Immigration, Litigation

Menjivar-Ayala v. Blanche — Ninth Circuit Holds BIA Must Consider Ineffective Assistance Claim Even When Attorney’s Failure Occurred Before a Different Court

automatic / July 9, 2026

The Ninth Circuit holds that the Board of Immigration Appeals has authority — and obligation — to consider ineffective assistance of counsel claims arising from an attorney's post-final-order misconduct before a different tribunal, and that mailing a courtesy copy of a BIA decision to a represented noncitizen does not overcome the presumption of prejudice from counsel's failure to notify them.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Labor & Employment Law, Litigation

Combs v. Netflix, Inc. — Ninth Circuit Sets Test for When a Sexual Harassment ‘Dispute Arises’ Under the EFAA, Holding Pre-2022 Internal Complaints Triggered the Clock

automatic / July 8, 2026

In a matter of first impression, the Ninth Circuit held that under the EFAA's timing provision, a "dispute arises" when an employee registers internal disagreement with an employer and the employer expressly or constructively opposes it — not when the employee later files a formal complaint — and that "claims accrue" under standard accrual principles; here both happened before March 3, 2022, so the EFAA did not apply and Netflix's arbitration agreement was enforceable.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Administrative Law, Environmental Law

Rinnai America Corp. v. South Coast Air Quality Management District — Federal Energy Law Does Not Preempt SCAQMD’s Zero-NOx Gas Appliance Rule

automatic / July 2, 2026

The Ninth Circuit, 2-1, holds that the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA) does not preempt the South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 1146.2, which phases in zero-NOx emission standards for gas water heaters and boilers to bring the Los Angeles Basin into compliance with federal ozone standards under the Clean Air Act.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Criminal Law

United States v. Shi — Ninth Circuit Rejects ‘Sophisticated Laundering’ Sentencing Stack Where Required Predicate Enhancement Was Never Applied

automatic / July 2, 2026

The Ninth Circuit affirms money laundering convictions and most sentencing enhancements in a $2.5 million Target gift-card laundering scheme, but vacates and remands because the district court improperly applied the sophisticated-laundering enhancement under USSG § 2S1.1(b)(3) without first applying the required predicate enhancement under § 2S1.1(b)(2)(B).

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Administrative Law, Constitutional Law, Environmental Law

Rinnai America Corp. v. South Coast Air Quality Management District — Federal Energy Law Does Not Block California’s Zero-Emission Appliance Rules

automatic / July 2, 2026

The Ninth Circuit ruled 2-1 that the federal Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA) does not preempt SCAQMD's Rule 1146.2, which phases out gas-fired water heaters and boilers across Southern California to achieve compliance with federal ozone standards — dealing a major setback to appliance manufacturers challenging the ban.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Criminal Law, Litigation

United States v. Shi — Ninth Circuit Vacates Sophisticated-Laundering Enhancement Where Required Guideline Step Was Skipped

automatic / July 2, 2026

The Ninth Circuit vacated a sophisticated-laundering sentencing enhancement because the district court applied the enhancement without first working through the required preceding step in U.S.S.G. § 2S1.1(b)(2), remanding for limited resentencing of three defendants convicted in a large-scale gift-card laundering scheme.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Civil Procedure, Criminal Law

Cannon v. United States — Government Cannot Keep Cash Stolen by Its Own Agent After Recovering It in Restitution

automatic / June 29, 2026

The Ninth Circuit ruled that sovereign immunity does not block a person from recovering seized cash that a federal agent stole and the government later recouped in restitution proceedings, reversing summary judgment for the government in a case where an FBI agent pocketed $218,200 of money seized during a drug investigation.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Criminal Law, Immigration

Leon-Briviesca v. Blanche — Ninth Circuit Defines “Crime of Child Abuse” for Immigration Removal After Loper Bright, Covers California Penal Code § 273a

automatic / June 25, 2026

In its first post-Loper Bright interpretation of the federal immigration removal ground for crimes of child abuse, the Ninth Circuit holds that the statute covers child endangerment, requires criminal negligence mens rea, and applies regardless of whether the defendant is the child's parent — and that California Penal Code § 273a(a) falls within its scope.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Immigration, Litigation

Ibarra-Perez v. United States — Ninth Circuit Refuses En Banc Review of Ruling That FTCA Suit for Wrongful Removal to Unspecified Third Country Is Not Barred by § 1252(g)

automatic / June 25, 2026

The Ninth Circuit denies en banc review of a panel ruling that 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g) does not strip federal district courts of jurisdiction over an FTCA damages claim by a noncitizen removed to Mexico when his removal order did not name Mexico as the destination.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law, Labor & Employment Law

Brown v. Alaska Airlines — Airline’s Firing of Flight Attendants Over Equality Act Posts Must Go to Jury as Religious Discrimination

automatic / June 24, 2026

The Ninth Circuit reverses summary judgment for Alaska Airlines and the AFA flight attendants' union, holding that two Christian flight attendants fired after posting about the Equality Act raised genuine disputes of material fact on Title VII religious discrimination, and that the Railway Labor Act does not preempt their Oregon and Washington state anti-discrimination claims against the union.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Labor & Employment Law, Litigation

Cocom v. ABM Aviation — Ninth Circuit Reverses Unconscionability Finding, Orders Enforcement of Employment Arbitration Agreement

automatic / June 23, 2026

The Ninth Circuit reversed a district court's refusal to enforce a pre-dispute employment arbitration agreement, holding that the agreement's scope was limited to employment-related claims under ejusdem generis, distinguishing Cook v. USC's broader unconscionability holding.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law, Labor & Employment Law

Union Gospel Mission of Yakima Washington v. Brown — Ninth Circuit to Reconsider En Banc Whether Religious Employers Can Require Staff to Share Their Faith

automatic / June 18, 2026

The full Ninth Circuit has agreed to rehear en banc a case about whether states can force religious nonprofits to hire employees who don't share their faith, vacating a panel opinion that had protected a Christian shelter's faith-based hiring practices.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Administrative Law, Environmental Law

Yurok Tribe v. Klamath Water Users Association — Ninth Circuit Holds Endangered Species Act Applies to Bureau of Reclamation’s Klamath Project Operations

automatic / June 17, 2026

The Ninth Circuit affirmed that the Endangered Species Act's mandatory consultation requirements apply to the Bureau of Reclamation's operation of the Klamath Project, a major federal water management initiative in Northern California and Southern Oregon, rejecting the Klamath irrigation districts' argument that the ESA cannot limit water releases already required by contract.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Administrative Law, Constitutional Law, Labor & Employment Law

American Federation of Government Employees v. Trump — Ninth Circuit Vacates Injunction Against Executive Order Stripping Federal Agency Unions of Collective Bargaining Rights

automatic / June 17, 2026

The Ninth Circuit vacated a district court injunction that had blocked President Trump's Executive Order 14,251 — which stripped roughly 800,000 federal employees across multiple agencies of collective bargaining rights on national security grounds — holding that the unions failed to show a likelihood of success on their First Amendment retaliation claim.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Criminal Law, Litigation

Detrich v. Thornell — Ninth Circuit En Banc Tightens Standard for Excusing Procedural Default in Federal Habeas Cases Under Martinez v. Ryan

automatic / June 17, 2026

In an en banc opinion, the Ninth Circuit affirmed denial of habeas relief to an Arizona death-row prisoner, clarifying that merely including an underlying petition as an exhibit does not 'fairly present' a claim to a state supreme court, and that Martinez v. Ryan requires a showing of reasonable probability of a different outcome in state postconviction proceedings — not just the potential merit of the underlying IAC claim.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Labor & Employment Law, Litigation

Orr v. United States District Court (C.D. Cal.) — Ninth Circuit Holds Courts Must Decide FAA vs. State Law Before Compelling Arbitration

automatic / June 9, 2026

The Ninth Circuit grants a UPS delivery driver a writ of mandamus requiring the district court to first determine whether the FAA or California Arbitration Act governs her employment agreement before compelling arbitration — a threshold question courts cannot punt to arbitrators.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Environmental Law, Litigation

Forward, Inc. v. MacOmber — General Supervisory Authority Over State Agencies Is Not Enough to Sue State Officials Under Federal Environmental Law

automatic / June 9, 2026

The Ninth Circuit holds that a landfill owner suing California's CDCR Secretary and DGS Director for RCRA hazardous waste violations ran into Eleventh Amendment immunity because general supervisory authority over agencies is not a "fairly direct" connection to the specific violations required to sustain a citizen suit against state officials.

Scroll to Top