Criminal Law

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Criminal Law

United States v. Tekola — Drug Trafficking Enhancement Applies Even When Defendant’s Apartment Is Also His Home

automatic / May 20, 2026

The Ninth Circuit affirmed a sentencing enhancement for maintaining a drug distribution premises, holding that a defendant’s apartment can qualify even when it also serves as his primary residence.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law

United States v. Kheyre — Departures Excluded from Amended Guideline Range in Sentence Reduction Proceedings

automatic / May 20, 2026

The Ninth Circuit held that courts may not include departures when calculating the amended guideline range in sentence reduction proceedings under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), making defendants whose original sentences fell below the amended range ineligible for reductions.

California Supreme Court, Criminal Law, Litigation

People v. Mitchell — California Supreme Court Holds Defendants Who Agreed to Upper Term Sentences via Plea Bargain May Seek Retroactive Benefit of SB 567

automatic / May 18, 2026

The California Supreme Court unanimously held that defendants who accepted upper term sentences as part of a plea bargain may seek retroactive benefit of SB 567’s amendments to Penal Code section 1170(b), but the remedy is a remand for the defendant to waive, renegotiate, or withdraw the plea—not an automatic sentence reduction.

3rd District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Criminal Law, Litigation

Nuanmanee v. Superior Court — Court of Appeal Holds Defendant Was Not ‘Brought to Trial’ When Court Policy Prevented Jury Empanelment on Last Statutory Day

automatic / May 18, 2026

The Third District Court of Appeal granted a writ of mandate ordering dismissal of a misdemeanor DUI case after the trial court’s policy of not empaneling juries on Mondays prevented the defendant from being brought to trial on the last statutory day under Penal Code section 1382.

1st District Court of Appeal, Criminal Law

People v. Lopez-Tapia — Court Holds Childhood Trauma Must Be Linked to Specific Offense to Trigger Lower-Term Presumption

automatic / May 15, 2026

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed a middle-term sentence for witness dissuasion, holding that evidence of childhood trauma alone does not trigger the lower-term presumption under Penal Code section 1170(b)(6) without sufficient evidence linking that trauma to the specific offense.

6th District Court of Appeal, Criminal Law, Litigation

People v. Superior Court (Feghhi) — Sixth District Orders Blood-Alcohol Evidence Reinstated in DUI Murder Case

automatic / May 14, 2026

The Sixth District ordered a trial court to reinstate blood-alcohol evidence in a DUI murder case, holding that a defendant's breath-test request is irrelevant to blood-draw warrant probable cause and that the implied consent statute does not override a valid warrant.

2nd District Court of Appeal, Criminal Law

People v. Wilmot — Murder Conviction Vacated After Jury Instruction Wrongly Added ‘Unintentionally’ to Manslaughter Definition

automatic / May 14, 2026

The Second District vacated a murder conviction because the trial court improperly added and underlined 'unintentionally' in the voluntary manslaughter jury instruction, misleading the jury about when heat of passion applies.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law

Bradford v. Vang — Ninth Circuit Holds Loper Bright Does Not Displace AEDPA Deference in Habeas Cases

automatic / May 14, 2026

The Ninth Circuit held that Loper Bright's elimination of Chevron deference does not undermine AEDPA's deferential standard in habeas cases, reversing a district court's grant of relief to a California death-row inmate.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Litigation

United States v. Sanchez — Ninth Circuit Adopts ‘Heavy Presumption of Prejudice’ Standard When Racially Biased Juror Is Removed Mid-Deliberation

automatic / May 12, 2026

The Ninth Circuit holds that when a racially biased juror is discovered and removed before a verdict is accepted, courts must apply the Remmer framework’s heavy presumption of prejudice—and reverses a tax-fraud conviction because the government could not rebut that presumption.

5th District Court of Appeal, Criminal Law, Litigation

People v. Robinson — Lifers Who Aren’t Sex Offenders Stay Eligible for SB 483 Resentencing

automatic / May 8, 2026

The Fifth District holds that Penal Code section 1172.75(f) excludes from resentencing only inmates who were both convicted of a sexually violent offense and sentenced to death or LWOP — reopening SB 483 resentencing for many lifers.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law

United States v. Chapman — Ninth Circuit: Federal Kidnapping Can Be Committed by Deception, But Conviction Vacated for Jury Coercion

automatic / May 8, 2026

The Ninth Circuit holds that federal kidnapping under 18 U.S.C. 1201(a)(1) can be committed by deception alone, but vacates the murder-kidnapping conviction because the trial judge improperly coerced a unanimous verdict from a deadlocked jury.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law

Burney v. Broomfield — Ninth Circuit Affirms Habeas Denial in Death Penalty Case, Finding No Judicial Bias

automatic / May 7, 2026

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of habeas relief for a California death row inmate, finding that the trial judge's informal and at times inappropriate comments during trial did not demonstrate bias or render the proceedings fundamentally unfair.

5th District Court of Appeal, Administrative Law, Criminal Law, Litigation

Myers v. Dept. of Motor Vehicles — Body-Cam Video Can Rebut Officer’s Claim of Continuous DUI Observation

automatic / May 6, 2026

The Fifth District holds that body-worn camera footage showing an officer left a DUI suspect alone in a patrol car during the required 15-minute observation period is sufficient to rebut the presumption that breath test procedures were properly followed.

2nd District Court of Appeal, Criminal Law, Healthcare Law

People v. Tourville — 2nd District Says Trial Court Cannot Condition Mental-Health Treatment on a No-Contest Plea Where Defendant Is Eligible for Diversion

automatic / May 5, 2026

The Second District holds that when a trial court finds a defendant eligible and suitable for mental-health diversion under Penal Code section 1001.36, requiring a no-contest plea as the price of receiving the same treatment via probation directly conflicts with the statute's purpose.

2nd District Court of Appeal, Criminal Law

People v. Mijares — 2nd District Affirms Murder Conviction Where Defendant’s Attack Was a Substantial Factor in Death Despite Victim’s Preexisting Conditions

automatic / May 5, 2026

The Second District affirms a first-degree murder conviction, holding the trial court had no duty to instruct on attempted murder where the defendant's brutal attack was a substantial factor in the victim's death even though the victim had grave preexisting heart and liver disease.

California Supreme Court, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law

People v. Morris — California Supreme Court Says Non-Killer Must Aid the Lethal Act, Not Just the Underlying Felony, to Be Guilty of First-Degree Felony Murder

automatic / May 4, 2026

The California Supreme Court holds that a non-killer accomplice with intent to kill is guilty of first-degree felony murder only if they aided the actual killer in the lethal act itself, not merely the underlying felony — reopening resentencing for many defendants previously denied.

2nd District Court of Appeal, Criminal Law

People v. Berch — 2nd District Holds Felony False Imprisonment by Menace Doesn’t Require Force Greater Than Restraint

automatic / May 4, 2026

The Second District holds that felony false imprisonment based on menace does not require a threat of force greater than necessary to effectuate restraint — a doctrinal clarification that affirms a domestic-violence conviction.

2nd District Court of Appeal, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law

People v. Moss — 2nd District Says Section 1172.75 Resentencing Court Can Reimpose Upper Term Without New Jury Findings on Aggravating Facts

automatic / May 4, 2026

When resentencing a defendant under section 1172.75, the trial court may reimpose an upper term using aggravating facts the defendant already stipulated to — no new jury findings required.

2nd District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Criminal Law

People v. Pineda — 2nd District Holds Codefendant’s Perkins-Operation Statements Are Admissible at 1172.6 Hearing as Declarations Against Penal Interest

automatic / May 4, 2026

The Second District holds that hearsay testimony from a preliminary hearing is admissible at a section 1172.6 evidentiary hearing if it qualifies as a declaration against penal interest — affirming denial of a gang-shooting resentencing petition.

4th District Court of Appeal, Criminal Law, Family Law

In re Parker B. — 4th District Says Unqualified WIC Section 782 Dismissal Encompasses Findings, Allowing Sealing of Section 707(b) Juvenile Records

automatic / May 4, 2026

The Fourth District holds that an unqualified Welfare and Institutions Code section 782 dismissal encompasses the underlying findings, satisfying section 786(d)'s "dismissed" condition for sealing serious juvenile offense records — but the firearm restriction survives.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law

Doerr v. Shinn — Ninth Circuit Amends Rhines Stay-and-Abey Order, Sends Atkins Intellectual-Disability Claim Back to District Court

automatic / May 4, 2026

The Ninth Circuit issues an amended opinion granting a Rhines stay-and-abey for an Arizona death-row petitioner's IAC-at-sentencing claim, and remands his Atkins intellectual-disability claim for the district court to address in the first instance.

California Supreme Court, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law

In re Kowalczyk — California Supreme Court Reaffirms Constitutional Right to Bail, Limits When Pretrial Detention May Be Imposed

automatic / April 30, 2026

California Supreme Court reaffirms the constitutional right to pretrial release, requiring prosecutors to prove the necessity of detention by clear and convincing evidence and forbidding boilerplate denial-of-bail orders.

California Supreme Court, Criminal Law

People v. Lopez — California Supreme Court Clarifies Senate Bill 1437 Resentencing for Aiders and Abettors of Gang-Related Killings

automatic / April 30, 2026

California Supreme Court holds that gang-enhancement and vicarious firearm-use findings cannot substitute for proof of personal malice in Senate Bill 1437 resentencing hearings, opening the door to new resentencing for aiders and abettors of gang-related killings.

California Supreme Court, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law

People v. Stayner — California Supreme Court Affirms Death Sentence for Yosemite Cedar Lodge Murders

automatic / April 30, 2026

On automatic appeal, the California Supreme Court unanimously affirms the convictions and death sentence of Cary Stayner for the 1999 Cedar Lodge murders of Carole Sund, her daughter Juli, and Silvina Pelosso. Justice Evans concurred and dissented in part.

1st District Court of Appeal, Criminal Law, Litigation

People v. Hsiung — Animal Rights Activist’s Trespass Convictions Partially Reversed for Erroneous Limitation on Mistake of Law Defense

automatic / April 30, 2026

First District partially reverses animal rights activist's trespass convictions arising from open-rescue activities at Sonoma County poultry farms, holding the trial court erred by limiting evidence of the defendant's good-faith mistake of law about the legality of his conduct under the necessity doctrine, while affirming the misdemeanor trespass conviction and rejecting First Amendment challenges.