California Supreme Court, Civil Procedure, Litigation
automatic /
July 16, 2026
The California Supreme Court held that when plaintiffs voluntarily dismiss their action before any of their claims have been finally resolved by the trial court, the dismissal terminates the action and forfeits the right to appeal — it does not create an appealable judgment even if the stated purpose was to expedite review of adverse pretrial rulings.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Banking & Finance, Civil Procedure, Litigation
automatic /
July 15, 2026
The Ninth Circuit reversed dismissal of a False Claims Act qui tam suit alleging PPP fraud by a California mortgage company, holding that a NAICS industry code alone does not publicly disclose fraud and that a company's own website does not qualify as 'news media' for purposes of the Act's public disclosure bar.
1st District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Litigation, Personal Injury & Tort
automatic /
July 14, 2026
California's First District Court of Appeal reversed a trial court that had refused to compel arbitration, holding that Cruise's mobile app sign-in screen gave an injured employee-rider sufficiently conspicuous notice of the arbitration clause in its Terms of Service, and that GM's related corporate entities were not "third parties" under the CCP §1281.2(c) exception.
1st District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Litigation
automatic /
July 13, 2026
A California Court of Appeal holds that writing “Loss is ongoing” with no dates or date ranges on a government claim form does not substantially comply with Government Code section 910, barring the claimants’ suit against a public agency.
4th District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Litigation, Personal Injury & Tort
automatic /
July 13, 2026
The Fourth District Court of Appeal clarifies that a school district’s immunity under Education Code section 44808 depends on where the district’s negligent act occurred — not where the student was ultimately injured — overruling two of its own prior decisions in the process.
4th District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Criminal Law
automatic /
July 13, 2026
The Fourth District Court of Appeal, on remand from the California Supreme Court, holds that a trial court ordering pretrial detention must make an express finding by clear and convincing evidence that no less restrictive condition than incarceration will adequately protect public safety — “balancing” alternatives against danger is not enough.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Civil Procedure, Litigation
automatic /
July 13, 2026
The Ninth Circuit holds that an ADA plaintiff who obtains a default judgment and injunction requiring a Fontana Family Dollar to fix accessibility barriers is a “prevailing party” entitled to seek attorney’s fees — even though the injunction only requires what federal law already mandates.
1st District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Litigation
automatic /
July 10, 2026
A California appellate court sanctioned an attorney $1,500 for AI-generated fabricated case quotations and held that contractual "attorneys' fees" clauses presumptively include separately billed paralegal time.
3rd District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Criminal Law, Litigation
automatic /
July 10, 2026
The Third District reversed a civil asset forfeiture judgment as to one claimant because the jury's special verdict was internally inconsistent: it found he had an ownership interest in the seized cash and that some of it was innocent, yet awarded him nothing.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Civil Procedure, Immigration, Litigation
automatic /
July 9, 2026
The Ninth Circuit holds that the Board of Immigration Appeals has authority — and obligation — to consider ineffective assistance of counsel claims arising from an attorney's post-final-order misconduct before a different tribunal, and that mailing a courtesy copy of a BIA decision to a represented noncitizen does not overcome the presumption of prejudice from counsel's failure to notify them.
2nd District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Family Law, Litigation
automatic /
July 9, 2026
A California Court of Appeal ruling holds that parties who stipulate to bifurcation in a dissolution case must promptly raise any same-judge objection or face Family Code section 271 sanctions — waiting eight months while attending multiple trial setting conferences is not timely.
4th District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Litigation
automatic /
July 8, 2026
The Fourth District held that trial courts must consider Code of Civil Procedure section 2023.050 — which imposes a mandatory $1,000 sanction for bad-faith document production conduct regardless of the other party's actual expenses — and that a self-represented litigant facing discovery stonewalling by opposing counsel is not left without a remedy.
California Supreme Court, Civil Procedure, Litigation, Personal Injury & Tort
automatic /
July 2, 2026
The California Supreme Court unanimously holds that the federal two-dismissal rule (FRCP 41(a)(1)(B)) bars re-filing only in federal court and does not preclude a subsequent action in California state court, reversing dismissal of school sexual abuse claims.
3rd District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Labor & Employment Law
automatic /
July 2, 2026
The Third District Court of Appeal affirms the trial court's refusal to compel arbitration of an auto dealership employee's wage and hour claims, finding the employer's adhesive arbitration agreements unconscionable under Cook v. University of Southern California (2024) due to high economic coercion and one-sided third-party beneficiary provisions.
1st District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Labor & Employment Law, Litigation
automatic /
June 30, 2026
The First District grants a writ of mandate requiring Tesla to face five joint complaints from 440 Black factory workers, holding that permissive joinder under CCP § 378 is proper where all plaintiffs allege injury from the same factory-wide pattern of racial discrimination — and that manageability concerns cannot justify ordering mass individual re-filings.
2nd District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Litigation
automatic /
June 29, 2026
A California appellate court ruled that a law firm's failure to disclose the potential conflict of interest in representing hundreds of sexual-abuse victims against the same defendant voided the entire engagement agreement — including its arbitration clause — under the state's professional responsibility rules.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Civil Procedure, Criminal Law
automatic /
June 29, 2026
The Ninth Circuit ruled that sovereign immunity does not block a person from recovering seized cash that a federal agent stole and the government later recouped in restitution proceedings, reversing summary judgment for the government in a case where an FBI agent pocketed $218,200 of money seized during a drug investigation.
4th District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Family Law
automatic /
June 26, 2026
The Fourth District holds that where a juvenile court treats a father as a presumed father throughout dependency proceedings without expressly saying so, the implied findings doctrine satisfies the requirement — but an explicit finding must be directed on remand, alongside mandatory ICWA compliance.
1st District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Criminal Law
automatic /
June 24, 2026
The First District holds that California's 2025 elimination of joint and several liability in juvenile restitution cases applies prospectively only, leaving pre-2025 restitution orders intact even for pending appeals.
5th District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Litigation
automatic /
June 24, 2026
The Fifth District holds that a law firm is not disqualified after firing a laterally hired attorney who had a conflict, where the trial court found no confidential client information was shared with the firm's remaining lawyers before the conflicted attorney was terminated.
4th District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Litigation
automatic /
June 23, 2026
California's Fourth Appellate District reversed the disqualification of defense counsel in a sexual battery case, holding that an inadvertently produced Dropbox index was too ambiguous to trigger attorney stop-and-notify duties, and that using non-privileged discoverable documents cannot support disqualification.
4th District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Construction Law, Litigation
automatic /
June 23, 2026
California's Fourth Appellate District held that California's absolute litigation privilege bars a property owner from suing an opposing construction expert for negligence in formulating repair recommendations contained in a litigation expert report, even after those repairs failed.
1st District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Insurance Law, Litigation
automatic /
June 22, 2026
California's First Appellate District affirmed denial of class certification in a UCL action alleging Transamerica's bundled Trendsetter LB life insurance policy misled buyers about the cost of included accelerated death benefits, holding that individual differences in agent communications and policy data pages prevented class-wide proof of deception.
1st District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Litigation, Real Estate Law
automatic /
June 11, 2026
When a county names the relatives of a deceased property owner in a housing receivership proceeding and then fails to establish their liability, those relatives are entitled to recover attorney fees from the county under Health and Safety Code section 17980.7(c)(11), which overrides the older, more general bar on cost awards against municipalities.
1st District Court of Appeal, Civil Procedure, Litigation
automatic /
June 11, 2026
A California appeals court upheld $6,000 in sanctions against a law firm whose outsourced contract attorney filed a brief containing two nonexistent case citations and eight fabricated quotations — likely generated by AI — confirming that attorneys of record bear ultimate responsibility for the accuracy of every filing regardless of who drafted it.